Plan a capped Meta creative experiment
Get the source data and prepare the review

Planning path only; current account-specific Meta setup/export UI unverified; launch blocked; not tested

WHAT WAS CHECKED
Public official documentation and supplied candidate artifacts only. No product login, account exports, client data, installation, credential access, external writes, advertising spend, template imports or live tests. Proposed prompts do not prove a feature supports every requested field. Missing required source data blocks execution.

BEFORE YOU START
- Existing authorized access to the correct source account and records; no new login, credentials, installation or permission grant is included.
- Responsible lawyer/operations reviewer approves scope, definitions and any later action.
- AI optional; use only approved minimized data and retain originals separately.

DATA ACQUISITION LIMITS
- Current exact Meta experiment setup and export controls were not publicly verified. This remains a planning recipe, not an operational launch guide.

STOP IF
- Missing all-in budget/fees, exact account eligibility, approved creatives, measurement definition or safe audience policy.
- Current official/account evidence of the actual A/B-test controls and report/export route has not been supplied.

KEEP THE ANALYSIS COPY SEPARATE
Keep untouched original exports/screenshots and the identifying source map in restricted firm storage. Build a separate minimized analysis file; do not hide raw client data on another tab. Include the complete Scope/coverage note in the AI-visible workbook or prompt. Use aliases and administrative metadata only. Unknown is not zero, false, completed or absent.

INPUT FORMAT LIMIT
All capitalized analysis tables and alias fields are editorial contracts. Native exports retain real vendor headers; mapping is explicit. No blank starter template is evidence of available data.

NATIVE REVIEW INPUTS
version: 1
status: Requires distinct native-input templates or an explicit reviewed mapping; existing kit is not drop-in compatible
compatibleWithoutMapping: False
existingKitFilesInspected: - file: INPUT-CHECKLIST.txt
firstLine: M03 OFFLINE EXPERIMENT BRIEF INPUT
requiredNativeInputs: - name: ApprovedCreatives
kind: approved_text_section
proposedDistinctTemplate: native-approvedcreatives-template.txt
requiredContent: Two actually approved creative IDs and the single approved variable; no invented assets or sensitive audience.
- name: Budget
kind: approved_text_section
proposedDistinctTemplate: native-budget-template.txt
requiredContent: Currency, maximum total allowance, fees/taxes, dates, stop owner, and actual account budget-control evidence.
- name: Measurement
kind: approved_text_section
proposedDistinctTemplate: native-measurement-template.txt
requiredContent: Primary metric, attribution window, available reporting/eligibility controls and source evidence; any unavailable exact menu remains blocked.
- name: Scope
kind: approved_text_section
proposedDistinctTemplate: native-scope-template.txt
requiredContent: Full approved scope, source account aliases, date filters, date basis/timezone, as-of capture time, definitions, source-to-alias map provenance, matching rules, inspected/excluded records, permission/privacy limits, missing-data reasons, coverage and responsible reviewer. Include recipe-specific policies, versions and tests. Scope must be inside the AI workbook or pasted packet, not merely a separate unprovided file.
templateFilesCreatedByThisTask: False
requiredGate: Kit owner must add the named inputs or document field-level mapping before replacing an existing kit prompt. Preserve the old kit contract; never rename headers without acquiring missing evidence.

OPEN THE INPUT MAPPING GUIDE
NATIVE-INPUT-MAPPING.txt
Use the distinct native input scaffolds listed below. Complete them from the acquired, reviewed evidence and include every required scope section in the AI-visible packet. Existing synthetic examples exercise the original review prompt only. They are not acquired evidence or a test of this native chain.

ApprovedCreatives: native-approvedcreatives-template.txt
Budget: native-budget-template.txt
Measurement: native-measurement-template.txt
Scope: native-scope-template.txt

STEP 1: Acquire an approved experiment brief and native eligibility evidence
Tool: Firm marketer / Meta Ads Manager
Open: Existing approved creative brief; Ads Manager Experiments feature (exact live submenu/report-export route unverified)
Access needed: Existing authorized access and relevant plan/region feature; exact live subscription and permissions not tested. No setup or persistent access changes included.
AI role: not_an_ai_step

Collect two approved creative IDs, one variable, primary metric/source, attribution window, all-in currency allowance, fees/taxes, dates, stop authority and historical aggregate volume. Staff with existing access captures available experiment options and displayed eligibility requirements. Do not create, publish or start a test.

Expected output: Verified planning inputs and account-option capture, or a launch-blocked brief.
Use it next: Prepare labeled ApprovedCreatives, Budget and Measurement sections plus full Scope with source evidence IDs. Paste this complete nonconfidential packet into Acrobat. Missing actual controls, currency/fees or measurement evidence stays visibly blocked.
Check: Meta Blueprint verifies experiments and conclusive/inconclusive results. Its public lesson links and a help page did not expose full current setup/export controls without login; no exact eligible option, report export or hard all-in cap is claimed.
Documentation limit: The source verifies the component feature; workflow prompts, schemas, manual captures, checks and handoffs are proposed editorial adaptations.
Source documentation:
https://www.facebookblueprint.com/student/path/219763-ab-test-conversion-brand-lift-course

STEP 2: Draft from the approved source packet
Tool: Acrobat PDF Spaces / AI Assistant, optional
Open: Acrobat home > PDF Spaces > Create a PDF Space > Paste copied text > Add to PDF Space > chat
Access needed: Existing authorized access and relevant plan/region feature; exact live subscription and permissions not tested. No setup or persistent access changes included.
AI role: downstream_application_ai

Paste only the approved nonconfidential packet, source IDs and full Scope note. Paste the exact prompt into the Space chat. Do not upload raw client records; this is a downstream drafting assistant, not an AI in the source application.

PASTE THIS PROMPT
Draft an offline experiment brief using only ApprovedCreatives, Budget, Measurement and Scope. Compare the two approved creative IDs and vary only the supplied creative element. State the question, primary metric, source, dates, equal-treatment assumptions, all-in ceiling, stop owner and triggers for broken measurement/privacy/policy issues. If fees/taxes, platform eligibility, budget controls or metric definitions are unknown, mark launch blocked. Include an inconclusive result and no automatic scaling. For any existing result capture, show observed spend/outcome arithmetic and the platform’s actual confidence fields only; never invent confidence, sample sufficiency, power or a winner. Do not target sensitive legal circumstances or start/spend/publish.

Expected output: Approval-ready experiment specification, reporting template and blockers.
Use it next: Copy reviewed output into an internal review document or the named downstream tool, preserving evidence IDs.
Check: A lower observed cost per result alone does not establish a winning randomized test.
Documentation limit: The source verifies the component feature; workflow prompts, schemas, manual captures, checks and handoffs are proposed editorial adaptations.
Source documentation:
https://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/desktop/explore-pdf-spaces/create-pdf-spaces.html
https://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/desktop/use-acrobat-ai/generative-ai-features/ai-get-answers.html

STEP 3: Prepare the evidence-reading handoff
Tool: Marketer and Excel reviewer
Open: Existing Meta Experiments result view; manually captured aggregate results if no verified export is available
Access needed: Existing authorized access and relevant plan/region feature; exact live subscription and permissions not tested. No setup or persistent access changes included.
AI role: not_an_ai_step

After a separately authorized experiment exists, the operator supplies its actual test ID, dates, variant allocation, metric definitions, spend, outcome counts and platform confidence/result labels. Manually capture visible results with screenshots if an export route is not verified. This future evidence is not fabricated now.

Expected output: A checked results ledger or a results-unavailable blocker.
Use it next: Use Excel for visible arithmetic, then return the platform’s actual conclusive/inconclusive status to the review document.
Check: Ordinary unequal ad delivery is not assumed to be a randomized experiment. Native account/budget controls may not cap taxes and fees.
Documentation limit: The source verifies the component feature; workflow prompts, schemas, manual captures, checks and handoffs are proposed editorial adaptations.
Source documentation:
https://www.facebookblueprint.com/student/path/219763-ab-test-conversion-brand-lift-course

STEP 4: Human review and final action
Tool: Responsible firm reviewer
Open: Internal Review worksheet / review document
Access needed: Existing authorized access and relevant plan/region feature; exact live subscription and permissions not tested. No setup or persistent access changes included.
AI role: not_an_ai_step

Attorney/marketer approve creatives, measurement, budget and any future launch separately. Save the plan with all unknowns.

Expected output: Capped planning brief; launch blocked until account evidence and approvals exist.
Use it next: Authorized marketer verifies current official controls inside the actual account before building.
Check: No live campaign, ad, audience, conversion-data upload or spend change.
Documentation limit: The source verifies the component feature; workflow prompts, schemas, manual captures, checks and handoffs are proposed editorial adaptations.
Source documentation:
https://www.facebookblueprint.com/student/path/219763-ab-test-conversion-brand-lift-course

ACCOUNT AND SOURCE CHECKS STILL NEEDED
- Meta help page redirected to login; no login attempted. Public Blueprint overview confirms feature family only.

USING THE FILES IN THIS KIT
Use the exact files or source text named in the steps above. Native exports keep their own headers. The kit tables are editorial review worksheets; they are not a claim that a product exports those fields. Some routes use reviewed text directly or require additional original files. Never rename an unreviewed raw export to make it appear mapped. Keep expected-result files separate from inputs.

The source account, actual data, prompts and end-to-end workflow were not tested. Any final communication, filing, permission change, payment or publication needs its own authorized human action. This guide performs none.
