Prepare a factual review-policy assessment from this public review and approved nonconfidential evidence. Cite the exact platform policy category, distinguish suspicion from proof, preserve the review link/date and list missing evidence. Draft a concise report for human review. Do not reveal client identity, accuse the reviewer publicly or promise removal.

Use posted_at only for an observed exact date. Keep a relative date label in the evidence note without inventing a calendar date.

INPUTS
reviews.csv: review_id, public_url, posted_at, captured_at, review_text
evidence.csv: evidence_id, review_id, nonconfidential_observation, source_ref, captured_at
report-history.csv: review_id, status, submitted_at, decision_ref, appeal_used; platform-policy.txt: current official policy categories and source references, evidence requirements and report/appeal limits

OUTPUT
review-evidence.csv: review_id, policy_category, supporting_evidence_refs, missing_evidence, assessment, current_report_status, human_next_step; report-draft.txt: factual nonpublic draft for authorized review

Use only these synthetic or firm-approved inputs and preserve source row/page IDs. Keep missing or conflicting evidence unresolved. Return a draft for the named reviewer. Do not send messages, connect accounts, change records or permissions, move money, or make legal decisions. Keep source files unchanged. List missing prerequisites before continuing.
