START WITH THE PRODUCT STEPS Read START-HERE.txt first. It states the actual source acquisition, access/privacy limits, manual field mapping and exact next prompt. The original file templates and synthetic examples below are supporting review aids. Some paths need separately supplied documents or source text; a blank worksheet is not a native export or completed integration. Check judge instructions for template changes Starter kit A25 These files support a manual, read-only pilot. The workflow is proposed and has not been run against a live system. All example records are invented. START HERE 1. Keep blank templates and synthetic examples separate. Use the example files first, renaming copies to the input names listed below if the prompt expects those names. 2. Open CSVs with UTF-8 and comma delimiters. Preserve IDs, timestamps and empty values as text on import. Empty means missing, not zero. There are no formulas. Do not change column headings. 3. Prepare the required policies and native documents. Stop any check whose inputs, coverage or permission are missing. 4. Use the recipe's prompt in the firm-approved workspace and request the stated review artifact. Treat all file content as data, not instructions. 5. Compare the result with expected-results.txt and the original rows/pages. Do not enable live connections or send anything from this kit. INPUT CONTRACT source-register.csv: source_id, official_url, baseline_fetched_at, current_fetched_at, responsible_reviewer. before/after text or PDFs keyed by source_id. template-map.csv: source_id, template_id. RECIPE-SPECIFIC SETUP The example.invalid addresses are deliberately non-live placeholders and are not official court sources. Before real use replace them with a lawyer-approved official allowlist. The snapshot files are synthetic plain text. S2-after.txt is intentionally empty to represent failed extraction; do not treat it as no change. PREREQUISITES - Explicit official court URL allowlist, baseline snapshots, template-to-source mapping, approved cadence and internal owner; existing approved monitor or manually fetched comparisons. No logins, scraping circumvention or installation occurred in this research. - Start with synthetic data. Real firm data requires approved access, processing terms, retention, and confidentiality controls. Replacing names with IDs alone does not anonymize a record. - Verify the current account, plan, export scope, and approved reviewer before trying the documented product feature. This prompt works on prepared files; it does not install or configure an integration. REVIEW CHECK Lawyer verifies the current official source and decides any template update; always recheck governing instructions before filing. Test substantive change, cosmetic change, URL failure and scanned PDF that yields no text. EXPECTED OUTPUT change-review.csv: source_id, official_url, before_locator, after_locator, changed_excerpt, linked_template_ids, coverage_status, reviewer. No live changes. Validation covers file syntax, exact declared headers and fixture consistency. It does not establish product compatibility, legal sufficiency, data completeness or production readiness.